Assignment 1: Continuity Planning Overview Due Week 2 and worth 75 points Suppose you were recently hired for a new initiative as a business continuity lead / manager at a medium-sized healthcare company. You have been asked to prepare a presentation to the Board of Directors on your main duties for the company and how your position could help protect the business in case of a large-scale incident or disaster. You have been alerted that since this is a new initiative and could come with a potentially large price tag, there is skepticism from some of the Board members. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: Explain the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager. Provide insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical. Discuss the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and describe the potential pitfalls of each. Speculate on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and explain how to overcome that challenge(s). Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.  Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Compare and contrast the methods of disaster recovery and business continuity. Explain risk management in the context of information security.  Use technology and information resources to research issues in disaster recovery. Write clearly and concisely about disaster recovery topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions. Points: 75 Assignment 1: Continuity Planning Overview Criteria   Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D   Fair 70-79% C   Proficient 80-89% B   Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Explain the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager. Insufficiently explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager. Partially explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager. Satisfactorily explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager. Thoroughly explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager. 2. Provide insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical. Insufficiently provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical. Partially provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical. Satisfactorily provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical. Thoroughly provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical. 3. Discuss the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and describe the potential pitfalls of each. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and did not submit or incompletely described the potential pitfalls of each. Insufficiently discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and insufficiently described the potential pitfalls of each. Partially discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and partially described the potential pitfalls of each. Satisfactorily discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and satisfactorily described the potential pitfalls of each. Thoroughly discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and thoroughly described the potential pitfalls of each. 4. Speculate on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and explain how to overcome that challenge(s). Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and did not submit or incompletely explained how to overcome that challenge(s). Insufficiently speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and insufficiently explained how to overcome that challenge(s). Partially speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and partially explained how to overcome that challenge(s). Satisfactorily speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and satisfactorily explained how to overcome that challenge(s). Thoroughly speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and thoroughly explained how to overcome that challenge(s). 5. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present